Beyond Tolerance to Tenacious Love

This piece was originally published at The Huffington Post on November 1, 2012.

The preservation and cultivation of tolerance is vitally important to the well-being of our multi-faith, pluralistic society. President Obama’s recent address to the U.N. General Assembly on the subject of such themes as religious liberty, tolerance and diplomacy in a violent world illustrated well why these ideals are so critically important in our world today and also reflect what makes the United States, though flawed, such a great nation.

As a Protestant evangelical Christian, I celebrate our country’s estimation of tolerance and the creation of space for freedom of religious expression in a multi-faith society, and for a variety of reasons. As the old saying goes, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Unlike some evangelical Christians who talk of taking back America and making it a Christian nation, I would never want to see one religious group—including my own—have a monopoly given how easily those in power religiously and politically can distort the use of power to unfortunate ends. Moreover, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s particular vision of beloved community inspires me to seek to cultivate relationships with leaders of diverse religious and political backgrounds to collaborate on promoting the common good.

With these points in mind, I have cherished the opportunity to build a friendship and partnership with Rev. Dr. Marilyn Sewell, a leading Unitarian Universalist. My friend Dr. Sewell asked me to write an article on the subject of tolerance and related notions that would also include a response to her thought-provoking piece titled “Saying Goodbye to Tolerance” published in The Huffington Post on October 19th, 2012. In the piece, she refers to me and reflects upon evangelicalism. Further to what she says about our personal connection, I have been grateful for the various opportunities I have had to meet and work with Dr. Sewell on such topics as global climate change and the need to build beloved community in the face of various culture wars. I write this article in the hope that this friendship and partnership can be further nurtured and cultivated based on our shared concerns over the common good in our multi-faith society.

As the title suggests, tolerance is the subject of Dr. Sewell’s article. I encourage the reader of this piece to read carefully “Saying Goodbye to Tolerance.” One of the concerns often raised concerning orthodox Christians is that their belief that Jesus is Lord leads them to be intolerant of other religions. While there are countless heinous incidents throughout history, where adherents of various religions (by no means only Christians) and secular/political ideologies have oppressed people of other traditions because of their strong convictions, the connection is not a logical one. Rather, the grounds for such ungodly acts are unbiblical from the vantage point of Jesus. In fact, for Christians, Jesus calls us to love all people sacrificially, including our enemies. We are called to forgive our enemies, not hate them (Matthew 5:43-48), and to lay down our lives for them, not theirs for us, just as Jesus laid down his life for us when we were his enemies (Romans 5:6-11).

In addition, it is important to note in a discussion on tolerance that tolerance and intolerance do not function as properties of beliefs but of behaviors. If tolerance were to be framed as a matter of acceptance of another person or tradition’s belief system, then anyone who rejects my belief system as true would be intolerant (I discuss this point in the book to which Dr. Sewell referred in her essay: Connecting Christ: How to Discuss Jesus in a World of Diverse Paths {Thomas Nelson, 2012}, pp. 312-313). My Zen Buddhist friends with whom a small group of evangelicals and I partner reject our Christian worldview but do not reject us personally. Rather they are very tolerant and respectful of us. I believe the same is true of our particular approach to them, and they have confirmed it (You can listen to a recent audio recording of my dialogue with Abbot Kyogen Carlson of Dharma Rain Zen Center at Powell’s Books on our partnership). I know of many adherents of various religious traditions, whether they be Buddhists, Muslims, Mormons, Hindus or Atheists who believe that their views best reflect ultimate reality and that my views are wrong. They are not morally culpable for holding their positions. They are not intolerant of me. To make such a connection would not be tolerance, but intellectual suicide. The result would also be the death of tolerance. Without tolerance, America could not function as a multi-faith society.

I do not have the right or basis to claim that those individuals who reject my beliefs are going to hell, a point raised in Dr. Sewell’s article. I am a sinner in need of God’s grace which I believe Jesus provides. I am to live as the repentant publican or tax collector, not as the self-righteous Pharisee, who claimed not to be in need of God’s grace (Luke 18:9-14). What is more, I do not shove my views on others, but hope to share the good news of Jesus with them in the hope that they, too, might come to experience the grace and mercy of Jesus, while also listening carefully and allowing them to share their faith with me. I am encouraged that there are a growing number of evangelicals who are doing the same, as illustrated in the work of the Evangelical Chapter of the Foundation for Religious Diplomacy. A mutual friend of Dr. Sewell and mine, journalist Tom Krattenmaker, and like Dr. Sewell, a self-professed liberal, is drawing attention in many of his writings to a more redemptive form of evangelical witness that is moving toward the radical middle.

Of course, there are extreme voices in my tradition who condemn those of other beliefs and lifestyles and who are guilty of hate crimes. Conservative Christians have been the recipients of such condemnation and oppression as well. And yet, in a nation where evangelical Protestantism is the largest Christian group in the United States (see the U. S. Religious Landscape Survey: Diverse and Dynamic, February 2008 of the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life), evangelical Protestants must be all the more on guard against using their influence and power not to harm others but to cultivate the common good that will benefit people of all walks of life. I share with Dr. Sewell concern over what these particular Christians might say and do and we need to be vigilant in challenging demeaning speech and safeguard against hate crimes’ occurrences concerning people of various walks of life.

Dr. Sewell’s words provide an important and timely reminder. They also sound an alarm. If my friend and colleague says goodbye to tolerance concerning my evangelical movement, those extreme and un-Christ-like voices within evangelicalism might gain the upper hand. In any conflict, intolerance only breeds more intolerance; hate only breeds more hate. As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. made clear in his Christmas sermon just months before his death, we must match intolerance and hate with love to build the beloved community, where the victory for the oppressed becomes a double victory that includes all people. However, tolerance alone is not sufficient. Tolerance can sometimes be confused with indifference. Tolerance must give way to tenacious love that overwhelms the forces of indifference, intolerance, and hate. Only then can we live into Dr. King’s vision of the beloved community and the common good, which for him was bound up with his faith in Jesus his uncommon Lord.

A Humble Suggestion for this Election Season

“Neighbors and Wise Men: Sacred Encounters in a Portland Pub and Other Unexpected Places”
by Tony Kriz

Editor’s note: New Wine was, in large part, birthed out of conversations shared between Paul Louis Metzger and Tony Kriz (whose name you may recognize from Blue Like Jazz). Tony is now a New Wine Fellow who continues to impact our work in many significant ways. Tony’s latest endeavor is Neighbors and Wise Men: Sacred Encounters in a Portland Pub and Other Unexpected Places. New Wine has teamed up with Windows Booksellers and Parish Collective to sponsor a celebration of the book and a conversation with Tony. Please join us for this event on Wednesday, October 24 between 4 – 7pm at Windows Booksellers (on the Multnomah University campus at 8435 NE Glisan St.). As we at New Wine gear up for our Church & State conference this weekend, here is a reflection from Tony on our current political climate. It’s a great sample of how Tony engages. We hope you’ll come continue this conversation at both the Neighbors and Wise Men book event on Wednesday, 10/24 and at Church & State on Saturday, 10/27.

 

Church & State
October 27 at Multnomah University

A Humble Suggestion for this Election Season

By Tony Kriz

Election seasons divide people.  They do so almost by definition: positions taken, votes collected, ideological-bases solidified (and polarized).

I fear that there is little to no hope.  Maybe for this one season, we need to accept that we live inside a high school debate class.  Tables are pushed to the edges of the room.  Two teams, defined by opposing views, are delegated.  And each of the teams retreat to their separate corners to refine their arguments and further fortify their philosophical faith.

On the other hand…

I gave a radio interview to a man who referred to himself as “a nationally known apologist for biblical truth.”  He had heard about the theme of my new book, Neighbors and Wise Men and wanted a half hour of my time.  I thought we were going to have a discussion.  I quickly learned he wanted a debate.

The theme of my book is: How people outside of my religious tradition (Christianity) have taught me the gospel and helped me walk with God.  This radio host seemed to find that theme distasteful, so he would ask me again and again, “How can you write on this topic and still hold to the true Christian dogma?”

Every time he did so, I would respond by saying, “That is a really important question, one that does not get asked enough.”  And I meant it, even though I might encourage a slightly different set of vocabulary.

There is a little known scholar from the last century by the name of C.S. Lewis.  Have you heard of him?  He wrote a little ditty called the The Four Loves and in the chapter on friendship he said:

“For us of course the shared activity and therefore the companionship on which Friendship supervenes will not often be a bodily one like hunting or fighting. It may be a common religion, common studies, a common profession, even a common recreation. All who share it will be our companions; but one or two or three who share something more will be our Friends. In this kind of love, as Emerson said, ‘Do you love me?’ means ‘Do you see the same truth?’”

And to this point, we might have thought that Lewis is encouraging us to retreat to our polarized corners.  But we would be wrong.  He continued:

“Or at least, ‘Do you care about the same truth?’ The man who agrees with us that some question, little regarded by others, is of great importance can be our Friend. He need not agree with us about the answer.”

To put Lewis’ point in my own words:  Friendship is not defined by having the same answers.  It is defined by caring about the same questions.

And isn’t that what an election season is really about?  Isn’t it more about a society coming together to determine the most pressing questions of our day?  Isn’t it about determining what items are of such profound importance that they demand public discourse?

So really, up until we enter the voting booth, as a society we are all voting together about what are the most important questions that we all share.

Here is my closing suggestion.  As we enter and re-enter the stage of ideology and debate, there is a powerful statement that you may want to memorize.  And here it is:

“Please forgive me, I am blind and simply cannot see this issue from your perspective.  We agree that this is an important issue.  Would you carefully explain your position again for me?”

You might find that understanding happens, compassion happens and just maybe… friendship happens.

Church & State podcast, part 3: Gloria Young

In this podcast series, New Wine Director Dr. Paul Louis Metzger interviews various individuals who will be speaking at the Church & State conference on October 27 at Multnomah Biblical Seminary.

In this installment our guest is Gloria Young. Gloria is an accomplished business woman in San Francisco and brings with her a history of civic engagement as an elected official. Gloria serves as New Wine Advisory Council Vice Chair with precise vision, spiritual passion, and incredible competency. Gloria introduced New Wine to the San Francisco Bay Area. From that introduction resulted partnerships with The John 17:23 Network, numerous ministry friendships, and even an event on fatherlessness as experienced in San Francisco and Portland. We have been very fortunate to be guided by Gloria’s leadership.

Listen to this conversation with Gloria Young about her thoughts on Church & State. Please note: due to circumstances out of her control, Gloria was originally slated to be a keynote speaker at the conference but has since had to step out. We thought you would still enjoy the conversation though!

We hope you’ll join us for this event on October 27. For more information and to register, please visit the Church & State page.

Church & State podcast, part 2: Tom Krattenmaker

In this podcast series, New Wine Director Dr. Paul Louis Metzger interviews various individuals who will be speaking at the Church & State conference on October 27 at Multnomah Biblical Seminary.

In this second installment our guest is Tom Krattenmaker. Tom is a religion columnist at USA Today and frequently writes about Evangelical Christians. As you’ll hear in the interview, Tom is not an Evangelical himself. His treatment of Evangelicals is refreshingly optimistic and hopeful as you can see in his acclaimed piece “The Evangelicals You Don’t Know“. Tom has a book by the same name due out in 2013. The book is an optimistic examination of the new currents in evangelicalism in politics and culture and it challenges progressives and secularists to rethink their notion that all evangelicals are their political enemies. For us Evangelicals, Tom’s “outsider’s perspective” is valuable for us, especially as we consider our engagement in matters of church and state.

Listen to this conversation with Tom Krattenmaker about what he’ll be discussing at Church & State and some of his hopes for how Evangelical Christians will continue to shape our cultural landscape.

We hope you’ll join us for this event on October 27. For more information and to register, please visit the Church & State page.

 

Church & State podcast, part 1: David Austin

In this podcast series, New Wine Director Dr. Paul Louis Metzger interviews various individuals who will be speaking at the Church & State conference on October 27 at Multnomah Biblical Seminary.

In this first installment our guest is David Austin. David is the Program Director for Mercy Corps’ operations in North Korea. Talk about an interesting job! David also serves on the New Wine Advisory Council and leads us well in the area of Christian diplomacy. He gave the keynote address at the 2012 New Wine banquet and famously confessed that the work our New Wine community engages in on 82nd Avenue during Friday Franks intimidates him more than the work he does in North Korea. We aren’t so sure about that, but we hope to learn from David’s conflict resolution skills in how he engages very complex and tense political situations.

Listen to this conversation with David Austin about what he’ll be discussing at Church & State and his work at Mercy Corps.

We hope you’ll join us for this event on October 27. For more information and to register, please visit the Church & State page.