For I Was a Stranger…

A shorter version of this piece was originally published at Leadership Journal where Tony is a regular contributor.

Author’s note: This article was directly influenced by the most recent New Wine conference titled “Immigration Reformation”.

I was a missionary for many years.

Many missionaries find writing newsletters home to be one of the more difficult parts of a missionary’s life.  It can be difficult to find regular topics that will interest and inspire supporters back home.

I never had that problem.

 

I was raised in a wonderful Conservative Baptist Church in Oregon.  I love my childhood church.  They were consistently supportive of me and my church’s membership funded a large majority of my decade plus of missionary service.

They always loved my newsletters home.

They loved to read about my adventures. I worked in several “difficult access” countries: religiously difficult, politically difficult and economically difficult.

I wrote stories about the risks we took to fulfill our missionary calling. In many locations we had to find creative ways to get in and out of countries just to fulfill our work.

In one country, we were labeled “false believers.” The government would never give us a religious visa as missionaries, so we lived as “tourists.” To do this, we had to leave the country every couple of months and reenter by another border crossing in order to live as perpetual tourist.  If creative, we could keep up this ploy for years.

In another country, missionaries had to invent other reasons for living there.  Some took the status of “student.”  Student visas were not highly scrutinized and even though we often “forgot” to enroll in classes, we felt justified because we were in fact “students of the culture”.

Many times I had to perform old fashioned smuggling of Christian materials.  We found wonderfully creative ways to move large stacks of papers across hostile borders.  The spaces behind the paneling of a car door, for instance, can hold a surprising amount of books and materials.

One time, one of my missionary friends lost her documentation while we were travelling.  She lost it in a particularly ill-fated location, a forgotten corner of the world where it was nearly impossible to get documents replaced. After much praying and scheming we devised a plan. First we chose a poorly staffed border crossing over a little used mountain pass.  We intentionally crammed our entire party, nearly a dozen people, into a single, fairly small vehicle.  Our friend was placed in the back row in the center.  The plan was to hand the bored and power-intoxicated border guards our entire stack of passports and hope that in the process of matching foreigners to documents, they might lose count (Don’t all Americans look alike?). It was a sweat-inducing and prayer-triggering thirty minutes of scrutiny.  Then, at the very moment it seemed our ruse would be discovered, there was a sharp shout from the dilapidated security house.  When the security force returned, agitated and confused, they simply abandoned the head-count and hastily waved our team through.  That was one of our closer calls.

I have stolen across a country at war on a train. This country considered the USA to be a devil.

I have endured interrogations, bailed friends out of jail and executed plans to avoid secret police, all to insure that our missionary work could continue.

Like I said, the adventures were many and the newsletters were easy to write.

Back home in Oregon, my church seemed so proud of me.  They praised me for my faith.  They praised me for my courage.  They found my stories inspiring. They cheered for every hurdle we overcame.  They supported every creative solution to each political and legal problem.

 

How about you?  Did you find yourself cheering when you read these stories, like my church back home?  Do you find yourself supporting such acts of creativity and courage?

If so, then you have just cheered for an undocumented worker (immigrant).  You have just supported someone who sneaks across borders in order to do a job that only exists on the borders’ other side.  You have just embraced the courage of someone who breaks the law because they believe in a better world.

Now, you may feel that it is a cheap trick to equate missionary endeavors to American immigration policy. But we, the Church, need to be careful how we wield the categories of “illegal.” It would behoove our credibility to admit that we don’t play by consistent rules. When the church partakes in illegal practices we often defend it, champion it and advocate for it. When “others” partake in very similar illegal practices we use a very broad brush to paint them as unforgivably wrong.

To be sure, I am not saying the two circumstances are identical parallels. There are certainly correlated issues associated with the current US immigration debate.  Here are a few: There is the perceived taking of US jobs by these sweat laborers and migrant workers.  There is the complicated impact on US federal funds and services. And there is the purveyance of criminal activity as some undocumented immigrants provide the supply to America’s demand.

These correlated topics are issues of strong debate in innumerable locations around popular media, in legislative sessions and across dining room tables. However, for the sake of this one small article, I would like to ask my sisters and brothers in Christ to consider the ways that we inconsistently apply the term “illegal.”  Also, could we consider that our passionate celebration of undocumented immigration by missionaries is fueled by applaudable desires (desires shared by all humankind):  a better world, a better future and the proliferation of the blessings of God to all peoples.

Finally, I would like to ask, regardless of each person’s political position on US immigration policy, could we all strive for godly language?  Words are important.  Words have deep meaning, theological meaning.  When we refer to a person as “illegal,” that is an identity statement.  It is a theological statement.  I believe sentences like—“We have to stop those illegals from crossing the border”—sorrows the heart of God.  On the other hand, a behavior can be illegal.  An act can be illegal.  Even a habit can be illegal.  But a person, a spiritual entity, a beloved creation of God, cannot be “illegal” in their identity.  People are beautiful.  They are eternally valuable.

C.S. Lewis said, “You have never met a mere human.” In that, he was sharing the idea that each human being (regardless of station or status) is so beautiful, so transcendent, so valuable that we should be dazzled, even enraptured by them.

Instead of “illegals” maybe we could start to refer to those travelers from the south as “Our undocumented neighbors.”  In the story of the Good Samaritan, Jesus chooses to exemplify the “neighbor” as a foreigner on a journey.  Let us heed C.S Lewis’ advice.  Let us pray for our hearts’ transformation so we can live full of compassion for our every neighbor… the neighbor across the street and the neighbor across the planet.

An Evening with Dr. John M. Perkins: On the Twilight of Life and the Dawning of the Next

Dr. Paul Louis Metzger interviewing Dr. John M. Perkins at The Justice Conference
Dr. Paul Louis Metzger interviewing Dr. John M. Perkins at The Justice Conference

My family and I went out to dinner last night in Portland with Dr. John M. Perkins and his young assistant, Thad. During the dinner conversation, we spoke about Dr. Perkins’ long life, his pain and struggles bound up with justice, and his eventual passing into the presence of the Lord (he’s been talking about that topic more often the past few years). The elderly though full of life Dr. Perkins quipped that “Everyone wants to go to heaven, but no one wants to die.” On the way home from the dinner, my wife and I laughed at how true the statement was. We find people all the time who claim in one way or another that they want to go to heaven, but do not want to die. The same holds true for us.

Some people don’t want to die because of the pain they associate with death, or the uncertainty of what follows, or the fear of impending judgment based on having lived poorly, or because they love this life and the people around them so very much. There are many other reasons. No matter the reason or reasons, there is a good chance we all think about the end of our lives and what might await us. That’s something we all have in common with Dr. Perkins. What I’d also like for us to have in common with Dr. Perkins is living life well before God and with others. Surely, like us all, Dr. Perkins has some regrets. But those regrets pale in comparison with the rich relational accomplishments he has achieved.

It was amazing how much Dr. Perkins talked about people last night over dinner—his wife and children, his friends and ministry partners, among others. He talked with joy about my children sitting on either side of him and how he delights in watching the children of his friends grow and seeing how the relationships grow with them.

Dr. Perkins’ relationship with God has so shaped him to care deeply about people. Gratitude marks his life—gratitude for God and gratitude for others who have cared for him over all the years. The care he has received has provided him with a moral compass, he remarked. He wants to honor and steward well those relationships. From where I sit, I believe he has done a wonderful job of it. Unlike the rich old fool in Luke 12:13-21 who tore down his barns to build bigger ones to store his grain and live selfishly, Dr. Perkins is wise and rich toward God. All the “barns” he has built in community development have gone up to store and redistribute grain to the poor.

Dr. Perkins’ long life is slowly winding down like a beautiful sunset, but his wisdom and passion for life and love of people never set. They seem to be glowing ever brighter with the passing of the days and months and years. That wisdom and passion and love accompany his growing anticipation that he will someday see Jesus face to face. Just being around Dr. Perkins helps me develop more my own moral compass.

Tonight my mentor and friend and ministry partner will share at Multnomah University about the upside down kingdom of God and how to walk upright in our day in love and truth and justice. The first time he shared there was 2001 and it changed the way I view life. I look forward to interviewing Dr. Perkins and hearing him share this evening and enlightening minds and burning hearts with God’s love at the twilight of his long and distinguished life and career. Whether we live as long as he does, may we live this life to the full, like he has, in view of Christ’s communal kingdom, until that hour, when we stand before God face to face.

Please join us this evening for Dr. John M. Perkins’ address, “The Upside Down Kingdom: Beyond Charity,” June 3rd, 6:30-8:30p in the Joseph C. Aldrich Student Commons at Multnomah University. The talk is part of the Advanced Ministry Lectureship Series “Rigorously Orthodox, Progressively Missional” sponsored by Multnomah Biblical Seminary, Multnomah University.

This piece is cross-posted at Patheos and The Christian Post. Comments made here are not monitored. To join the conversation, please comment on this post at Patheos.

The ABC’s of Predatory Proselytism: Always Be Closing

iStock_000013364303_ExtraSmallBy Paul Louis Metzger and John W. Morehead

Most of us cringe when we hear a knock on the door and see a salesperson there. We often have a similar distaste for the prospects of visiting a car lot as we try to buy a new or used car. It’s not that we aren’t interested in purchasing products; it’s that we don’t want to engage certain kinds of salespeople—those geared toward hard sales. Hard sales salespeople follow a predetermined script with the goal in mind of getting us to buy their product, and quite possibly at the expense of our wants and needs. For these salespeople, it’s about the ABC’s of hard sales: always be closing, like Alec Baldwin’s character in Glengarry, Glen Ross, as he pushed the company’s salespeople: “Always Be Closing.”

We may not realize it, but many times Evangelicals are perceived in this same way by others when it comes to sharing our faith. We are taught various evangelistic techniques and memorize a way to present the gospel message. Some programs include a list of objections that people might have, and we learn various responses so that we can overcome these obstacles. All of this involves the most noble of goals as we want people to embrace Christ and become his disciples just as we have. But many times our evangelism becomes a sales script of process over person aimed at closing the deal. Given that the gospel is not ultimately a sales script or a business contract, but a covenant of interpersonal communion with a personal God revealed in the person of Jesus Christ, we are called to engage people relationally. Such engagement will involve dialogue, not monologue, whereby we listen well and invite others to respond to the good news in non-coercive ways and which address their own deep-seated personal needs as revealed in life-on-life and heart-to-heart encounters.

Salespeople are in business to sell products. Can you blame them? It’s their livelihood, and they have to eat, too. They draw upon a polished presentation in order to make the best case possible in the hopes of persuading their customers. This is fine as far as it goes, but when the salesperson responds by rote and simply repeats a previously memorized script without interacting with the needs and concerns of their customers, then they are dishonoring them. The best and most ethical salespeople don’t operate in this way. Approaching customers in this manner ignores an authentically personal way of engagement that involves truly listening to what the other party is saying, including creating the space for the possibility that they might not be interested in what the salesperson is encouraging them to purchase.

Unfortunately, Evangelicals too often fall into this trap in their zeal for evangelism. When we do, we cross the line from ethical evangelism into what some like Padma Kuppa have called predatory proselytism. It can happen in a number of ways. When we create our canned scripts with slick messages and seeming answers to every objection out of fear that if we don’t engage in hard sell tactics we will lose the person(s) in question for eternity, we often unknowingly move in the direction of predatory evangelism. We want to see someone saved, but in the end we devour them in our efforts to save their souls. We need to do our best to be faithful witnesses, but we must leave the results to a sovereign and merciful God who does not screw up.

The fear noted above is not the only fear. Many of us succumb to the temptation to memorize and regurgitate a script because we are afraid we will screw up the evangelistic encounter with someone. It may help us to know that Jesus and Paul did not operate by way of a static evangelistic script. What they said always got at facets of the overarching gospel message, but by no means was it a once-and–for-all-delivered-to-the-saints gospel tract. While the faith is once and for all delivered (Jude 1:3), they contextualized the good news to various encounters. For example, while both Peter and Paul focused on Jesus in their preaching, they framed their messages differently because of the needs of diverse audiences.

In Acts 2 Peter speaks to an audience of Jews and Gentile converts to Judaism, and he presents his message via an appeal to Jewish Scripture so as to emphasize Jesus as the Son of David and Messiah, crucified but also vindicated by God through the resurrection. When Paul presents the gospel to Athenian philosophers in Acts 17 he uses a very different approach, citing aspects of Greek culture and creation, culminating in Christ’s resurrection as a demonstration of Jesus as cosmic judge (note how different Paul’s approach is when addressing a Jewish audience; see Acts 21:17-23:11). The gospel message does not change, but the perspectives and needs of individuals require that we frame the gospel to speak to them in relevant, meaningful ways. It is also worth noting that in Acts 17, for example, Paul does not apply pressure to close the deal. He presents the gospel and his hearers respond in three ways: skepticism/rejection, openness to further discussion, and belief (Acts 17:32-34).

It may also help us to know that our God who is sovereign wants to relieve us of the pressure that hard sale evangelism brings with it. We don’t have to convert anyone, since none of us can close the deal anyway. God’s Spirit alone brings people to faith as the Word of God is shared and it penetrates people’s otherwise hardened hearts (see for example Rom. 10:17-21). While of course we should seek to be faithful witnesses, and God wants to use us in evangelism, we have no capacity to transform hearts and lives. We don’t even have the power to transform our own hearts. It is God who works in us to produce the work of faith in our own lives (See Ephesians 2:8-10).

Personally speaking, we are not about hard or soft sales in evangelism, since there is no commission associated with the Great Commission. Our job is simply to share and invite people to respond to Jesus relationally, not sell them religious products.

One way to get at a more relational approach involves sharing one’s own story of how one came to faith in Christ. It can be done in a variety and combination of ways, whether verbally, through a lifestyle of discipleship, and through listening to the stories of those with whom we share. Whatever way we express the good news of Christ, we do so with no strings attached. Sharing one’s story and listening to others can help all parties involved move beyond their fears of evangelistic witness, both the Evangelical who wants to “do it right” as well as our conversation partners who are concerned about unethical and high pressure evangelism. After all, it is not a canned sales scheme. It is one’s life. So, in place of “always be closing,” let’s move toward ABS & ABL: Always Be Sharing and Always Be Listening to others share.

This piece is cross-posted at Patheos and The Christian Post. Comments made here are not monitored. To join the conversation, please comment on this post at Patheos.